By assessing the systemic thinking of the heads of sports federations in the governorates of the Middle Euphrates, the research was important for identifying the strengths and weaknesses in the federations' performance and work, which contributes to the development of sports work there and benefits our national sport as a whole.

As the following questions (What is the actuality of the systemic thinking enjoyed by the leaders of sports federations in the governorates of the Middle Euphrates, which qualifies them to take the helm of administration there?) demonstrate, the research problem is represented by these questions. And what exactly distinguishes the leaders of the sports federations in the governorates along the Middle Euphrates' levels of competition?

From the above, the researcher identified the objectives of the research in preparing a measure of systemic thinking among the heads of sports federations in the governorates of the Middle Euphrates to identify their levels of systemic thinking and according to the point of view of the members of those federations. Also, identifying the nature of the differences between the levels of sports federations among the heads of sports federations in the governorates of the Middle Euphrates. Through the results reached by the researcher, the most important conclusions were that sports work works to develop the level of systemic thinking among heads of sports federations. The level of systemic thinking possessed by presidents has an impact on increasing and developing their systemic thinking in their sports work. Thus, the researcher recommends training federation presidents to develop systemic thinking skills and use them in their sports work to develop and increase thinking in their work and to benefit from the systemic thinking scale prepared by the researcher in evaluating other sports federation presidents.